Home
 
 
01 May 2008 @ 06:48 am
Recession? What recession?  
Those of you who watch or read the news have probably heard all about the credit crunch and how that's spiralling our economy into recession. Some news programs are actually being quite sensational about it and preaching doom and gloom.

My long-time readers will remember that I used to be a market analyst and that I kinda view watching the economy as a hobby these days. And I love to share my analysis with you.



Well today I say unto you: What recession?

You see, the classic textbook definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative growth.

The US economy grew 0.6% in the first quarter of 2008.
The US economy grew 0.58% in the last quarter of 2007.

That's small growth. But it is NOT negative growth. Therefore, the economy is not recessing.

Furthermore consumer spending -- which makes up two-thirds of our economy -- GREW 1% this quarter. This number also grew 2.3% in the last quarter of 2007. These numbers are compared to the same quarter in the previous year. Therefor our Christmas spending in 2007 was actually HIGHER than Christmas spending in 2006, BEFORE the credit crisis.

What we've got here is a slowdown. And guess what! Our economy was inflated. It needs to slow down.

So what's going on here? Three things. First of all, there is the "Credit Crunch". A bunch of banks wanted to make some money so they invested in high-risk loans. Banks are not charities. Banks are in the business of making money. So they took a risk and it bit them on the ass. Remember the junk bond scandal of the 1980s? Similar thing.

As a result of this loss, banks have to make their money back. How do they do that? They make loans. But here's the problem: we've been experiencing inflation (also not a sign of recession), so the Fed has cut the Fed Funds Rate. This is the rate at which banks lend money to each other. So the amount of money banks can make from each other -- their biggest money-maker -- is signficantly restricted by the rapidly dropping interest rate.

Add to the low rate the fact that the credit crunch has led to many people defaulting on their loans. This means that there are not a lot of people who are good loan risks. Banks are terrified of lending money to people who will default. They can't take the risk right now. So they aren't lending a lot of money right now.

Of course the problem is that the only way they can help themselves is to make loans. And they're not making loans. Just today, the Bank of England has criticized them for this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7375881.stm

Okay. So that's the first thing that caused this economic slow-down.

The second thing is the price of oil. The price of oil has risen hugely over the past two years. The fact that this rise simply corrects a long-term lack of growth notwithstanding. If gas prices had increased with inflation since the 1970s as they should have, gas would be about the same price it is today. But because of oil industry factors too complex to discuss here, it happened all at once and sudden changes in prices like that make us crazy.

So oil costs more. And that means getting to work costs more. And shipping costs more. Businesses need to pay more to get their goods to market. You need to pay more to get things to your house.

Do we buy less? I don't think we do. We want life to go on as it always has. So our spending stays the same. And because we're spending more to get things because of the price of oil, we're actually stimulating economic growth! Isn't that tricky?

So this second factor in the recession may actually be a force for positive growth.

A third sector that is hurting the economy is the price of food. Whether it's for political reasons in third world countries or weather conditions and short harvests or farmers turning crops into ethanol, not food, it doesn't matter. Food prices are up. Again, while this hurts the pocketbook, it is good for the economy. Yes, we may have to give up other things in order to buy food. But we will. And as long as we keep buying food, it will equalize.

So two out of the three reasons for the recession are actually issues that could end the recession. Not bad.

Further proof that we're not in a recession: A report by ADP Employer Services showed that private sector employers added 10,000 jobs in April, slightly higher than expected. Hear that? HIGHER. More jobs were added than expected. You don't add jobs in a recession.

The best thing you can do for this economy is to spend. Don't spend outside your means. But keep buying things as usual. If you have a good enough credit rating to get a mortgage from our scared-of-their-own-shadows banks, do it. There are huge bargains on the housing markets as people who bought foolishly are losing their houses. If you can get a mortgage, it will be at a record low rate right now and you can get houses for extremely low prices. Lookie here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7373641.stm

Buy low. Sell high. Keep the economy ticking along. Spend in a logical manner. Don't put your money in low-interest funds. Be smart. Buy good things. Don't stretch yourself too thin. Be cautious but don't be afraid. There's nothing to be afraid of.

My message to you: Don't let this sensationalistic grandstanding and panic-mongering scare you. Just go about your business. Do what you need to do to take care of yourself, your family, your business. Don't listen to the newsreporters. They LOVE panic. Just ignore them. They're idiots.

Listen to me. We're all going to be fine.

There's no recession here. Move along...
 
 
( Post a new comment )
[info]sileas_1 on May 1st, 2008 11:46 am (UTC)
Thank you for that. You have taken the "complicated" out of current economics. At least for me. (Does this mean I can go shopping this weekend?)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
kass_rants[info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 11:59 am (UTC)
Yes! Go shopping! I don't know anything about how the Canadian economy is doing, but I suspect that it's pretty closely linked to the US economy.

Be conservative. Don't over-extend yourself. But if you have the money in your pocket, go shop!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
arcadian72[info]arcadian72 on May 1st, 2008 11:54 am (UTC)
How beautifully written! However, being a househunter in Eastern PA, I have to say that the only "deals" in houses are that the 750,000 house have come down to 675,000. But for people one step from the bottom level - houses aren't really coming down. I've been looking for a year. the media needs to tell the people selling that they actually have to reduce their price. ;)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
kass_rants[info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 11:58 am (UTC)
Thank you!

Well, you see, the people selling the houses can't sell them for less than they owe on them. So that's why the prices on lower-end houses aren't coming down. But I am seeing A LOT of "auction" signs out there and those houses are going to be bargains.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]arcadian72 on May 1st, 2008 12:06 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 12:56 pm (UTC)
Meriall[info]bantiarna on May 1st, 2008 12:02 pm (UTC)
Bravo! You have said what I have been trying to say but lacked the education to make it clear. I am so tired of hearing about the housing crisis. Most of the people loosing their shirts in real estate are NOT loosing their primary homes. Its flippers who are loosing it, people who bought up tons of property to flip and resell who bought on credit or people who took out loans far out of what they could afford by getting an adjustable loan figuring they would sell it before it adjusted. Then well . .they got caught. The average Joe is not affected by the housing crisis (I am sure SOME people are affected but the majority are what I have described here)
As you say its all media grandstanding, Chicken Little in the town square.
I plan to spend my economic stimulus package on costuming.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
kass_rants[info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 12:57 pm (UTC)
Right on, lady! The people who have been bit by the crisis are the speculators -- professional or amateur -- who bought a house that costed more than their budgets could afford with the idea that they'll either "flip it", as you said, or refinance as soon as the rates went down. But now the rates are down and they're mortgaged to their eyeballs and can't get a loan.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
Tasha Dandelion Kelly[info]tashadandelion on May 1st, 2008 12:06 pm (UTC)
See, I don't really care what the gubmint calls it, all I know is food and gas are hurtin' ma' pocketbook. :^D

I'm waiting for someone to invent a 'build-it-yourself' car kit with a 100mpg rating and a total cost of $5 grand to build (the instructions would be free).

So... who's gonna make my dream come true? Hope springs eternal.

The other thing that sux is the trend in static pay. Most of my colleagues in the corporate sector agree with me that the best way to increase one's salary is to job-jump. Companies have stopped promoting from within as often as they used to, and what promotions are given often come with very measly raises. I couldn't get a raise out of my old company, but my new company hired me for over $17,000 more a year without blinking an eye. Crying shame, it is. This encourages a ruthless lack of loyalty in employees. While companies have been that way for years now toward their employees, I'm not sure why they'd also do their best to ensure it works the other way too.

What are your thoughts on that problem? IMO, anemic pay raises coupled with a higher cost of living can inspire people to spend less. Like me. (Witness my post about reducing my food spending. It's not the only thing, alas, to get the cut. I can no longer justify my whimsical high heel shoe habit now either. *SOB*)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
kass_rants[info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 01:11 pm (UTC)
So... who's gonna make my dream come true? Hope springs eternal.

An Indian company has unveiled a new economy car that I think costs something like $3000. The problem with it is that you wouldn't want to drive it on the highway. This is the problem with all the little "town drivers" -- they are so small and so slow and so cheaply made that they are damned scary when you're surrounded by SUVs going 80mph.

What are your thoughts on that problem? [the lack of pay raises conmensurate with rising prices]

This is the trap of working for a salary. Companies are not beholden to their employees. They are beholden to their shareholders. If a company makes a 10% profit, they pass that on to the shareholders in the rising price of their stock. They are not required -- neither by law, convention, or conscience -- to pass that on to their employees. Matter of fact, a 2% raise in salaries to "celebrate" a 10% raise in profits would probably be heralded by the employees as a great achievement.

Job-jumping (aka "lateral moves") is a good strategy. We no longer live in the world where five or even ten years at the same company was required for a resume not to look fly-by-night. We certainly don't live in our parents' and grandparents' world where you retired from your first job 40-50 years later. Loyalty is not rewarded. At the highest paying job I had, they tried to ensure loyalty by setting up a profit-sharing fund for each employee. You could only access the money in the fund if you'd been there for four years. But you could access a portion of it after two years. Two years is not a long time to be at one company but their choice of numbers indicates that most people weren't staying that long.

Another solution is to start a part-time small business. Nothing big. Nothing that you intend to do full-time. Selling things on eBay. Renting a stall at an antique market on the weekends and selling stuff you've found at estate auctions. Things like that. It must be something where you have a high profit margin and a low energy requirement (because you work full-time and are a full-time Mom). In other words, making clothing for people isn't eligible. You also want to choose something that requires little overhead -- if you rent a stall at an antiques market on the weekends, make sure you're not locked into a long-term lease so you can pull back if you're not making enough money at certain times of the year, or if there aren't any good antiques at the estate sales you go to.

In other words, the best way to deal with rising prices is to increase your income. And the best way to increase your income is to be your own boss. In our world of online auctions and e-commerce websites, that's a whole lot easier than it used to be.

I hope that gives you some ideas. I really have empathy for your situation. When I bought this house, I lost my full-time job two weeks later. Too late to go back to our apartment, so I had to do something.

It's amazing what you can do when you have to.

And you're strong, T. And intelligent. I know you can do this.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]oogiem on May 1st, 2008 02:05 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 02:42 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]oogiem on May 1st, 2008 05:16 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 05:33 pm (UTC)
janielfb: Swan[info]janielfb on May 1st, 2008 12:09 pm (UTC)
Every time I ask my husband to take me out to eat, I remind him we're "stimulating the economy". Lowe's just gave us one year with zero interest for the supplies we needed to fix a bathroom.

Let the Fed keep lowering the interest rate. I'm paying down the stupid credit cards and can actually see paying them off in the near future. :)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
kass_rants[info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 01:12 pm (UTC)
Yup. And that's why the Fed lowers the interest rate like that -- so you can spend!

As long as we stay within our means and don't get stupid with credit cards and loans, we'll be fine. =)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]ootwoods on May 1st, 2008 07:25 pm (UTC)
redsquirrel[info]redsquirrel on May 1st, 2008 12:58 pm (UTC)
Ah. Well, I haven't been following the numbers, so I didn't realize the economy has actually been growing. But I have known quite well that the "housing crisis" is an natural correction to a bubble market as a bunch of greedy idiots get bit in the butt. It's a regular cycle down here in FL. Over and over again, they forget that it's like a game of musical chairs -- somehow, they never believe that when the music stops, they're going to be the ones left without a chair. What I can't believe is that the gub'mint is actually talking about "rescuing" these twits! Think that'll fly?

As to the price of oil, well, I know it hurts, but as someone who lived through the OPEC price hikes of the 1970s, duh, we didn't see this coming? No national energy independence programs, development of alternative fuel sources? Excuse me, I think we're about 35 years late in some of our initiative. We put men on the moon in ten years, come on people. With what we've spent on this stupid war, we could probably manage to almost not need to import the stuff. Sheesh.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
kass_rants[info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 01:14 pm (UTC)
Yeah. The oil thing is just a lot of whining. You're right -- we've spent 35 years doing relatively nothing. And now we whine about fuel prices.

Good for you on recognising the "housing crisis" for the correction it is. It *is* hurting people who got talked into dumb loans because the banks got greedy. But most of the people getting hurt are the speculators. That's why they speculate -- you have an equal chance of winning or losing. Sometimes you make a million dollars. Sometimes you eat it. And they'll just declare corporate bankruptcy and do it all again next really with a new LLC.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
re 1970s oil hikes - [info]reabhecc on May 1st, 2008 03:28 pm (UTC)
Re: re 1970s oil hikes - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 03:33 pm (UTC)
Re: re 1970s oil hikes - [info]melaniesuzanne on May 1st, 2008 09:05 pm (UTC)
evilapprentice[info]evilapprentice on May 1st, 2008 01:06 pm (UTC)
I love it when you talk financial.

So, question from the p-nut gallery... Is there any way of "self fulfilling prophecy" if the media keeps this up?
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 01:18 pm (UTC)
Iseulte of the Red Cliffs: couch angel[info]isenglass on May 1st, 2008 01:30 pm (UTC)
Thank you for posting this. I appreciate your view, and not just because it mirrors mine. *grin*
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 01:42 pm (UTC)
Megs[info]reabhecc on May 1st, 2008 02:00 pm (UTC)
Good advice. I will say that we're in a situation where it really sucks to be looking for a job - but it's been that way since early 2001, imo.

regarding the price of oil - someone I was talking to last night observed that the price of a barrel of oil in Euros has remained constant, it's just that the dollar is falling (like a stone).
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 02:36 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]reabhecc on May 1st, 2008 03:26 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 03:37 pm (UTC)
Julie, JulieInTheGreen, "Squire!"[info]brickhousewench on May 1st, 2008 02:10 pm (UTC)
I *love* it when you post about finances! You explain things so very, very well. Thank you for writing this.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 02:38 pm (UTC)
florentinescot[info]florentinescot on May 1st, 2008 02:23 pm (UTC)
I really <3 English Explanations.

Thanks!
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 02:37 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]florentinescot on May 1st, 2008 03:56 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 04:01 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]florentinescot on May 1st, 2008 04:30 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 04:35 pm (UTC)
Lady Celia[info]ladycelia on May 1st, 2008 02:34 pm (UTC)
Beautifully explained, succinct and understandable.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 02:36 pm (UTC)
Countess Adele[info]countess_adele on May 1st, 2008 02:36 pm (UTC)
Thank you, thank you, thank you ,Kass. You listen well my dear. Can I adopt you? You have the gift of giving a simple outline to what is other wise a mixed message the media is trying to pass off as news worthy economy facts. We are all listening to the crape and wondering if the USA is really going in the direction of a third world economy in a few years. It might take an earthquake in Ca to start the ball rolling, or so I've been told by CBS news. Thanks again for your educated insight.

The Countess
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 02:39 pm (UTC)
Quod Scripsi Scripsi[info]quodscripsi on May 1st, 2008 03:39 pm (UTC)
It is not just that our economy was inflated but our lifestyles had become so as well. Time to trim the fat in our society cause we are no longer alone at the top of the food chain. We can no longer expect to just be the top, we have to actually compete.

Its like the steel industry and the number of mills that have shut down or been sold and shipped to China. Many if not most of those same mills were the same ones we were producing steel during WWII. Almost every steel mill in Europe was built after WWII. At some point it will become cost effective to build new ones here.

What concerns me most is the corporations which are more interested in short term profits then in a longer term view.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 04:01 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]ootwoods on May 1st, 2008 07:15 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 09:51 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]ootwoods on May 1st, 2008 07:11 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 09:56 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 10:05 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]ootwoods on May 1st, 2008 11:09 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 11:12 pm (UTC)
ootwoods[info]ootwoods on May 1st, 2008 07:08 pm (UTC)
Tell people something often enough, they will believe it.

POLITICS. If you can convince people they are in a recession, they will blame the "powers that be". Be sure, of course, to continually say "Bush Regime" or the similar. Do not in ANY WAY let on that the opposition actually controls congress.. that would defeat the purpose.

Tell people that their lack of ability to affird 500K houses on a 40K a year salary is the fault of TPTB, rather than reality. Tell people that not being able to spend virtual (credit, loan, etc) money on momentary distractions like big screen TV's and overpriced consumer goods is the fault of TPTB.

Remember, sheeple have a very very short memory. SO if you can do this for an entire year before the elections, you can convince them that their own disconnect from reality is, in fact, the fault of TPTB (even if they really _aren't_ TPTB) and they will vote the way you want them to.

It's rather simple, really.

(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 10:00 pm (UTC)
Lettice Weaver[info]lorihalia on May 1st, 2008 08:33 pm (UTC)
Here in Michigan the foreclosures are apparently so bad that there is now a commercial on TV with Granholm telling people that if they're going to loose their house, call such and such gvmt # and get special help to prevent it.

I also found out from my mother's side of the family that Amway has literally been going through the ranks of factory seniority, and canning people from the top downwards pretty hard core the last 5 months.

My mother was apparently canned about 4 months ago (I heard of it from my aunt), my step-mother may have also been let go (she's management), and my aunt knows she's on 'the list' so she's saving evey dime she can. =/
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
standgale[info]standgale on May 1st, 2008 10:56 pm (UTC)
If you ever need a side job or hobby, you could write a weekly column on the economy, etc for some website or news paper :D You make it very understandable (although presumably much is simplified/not mentioned/glossed over) unlike most sources I have for this kind of information, which is impenetrable. Along with understandable, it's actually interesting, which is kind of amazing. I think this kind of stuff is the sort of thing everyone should have a basic understanding of, so we understand the world we live in, but it's generally too confusing or complicated.
Whether you're ranting or educating, you're a good writer.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
(no subject) - [info]kass_rants on May 1st, 2008 11:14 pm (UTC)
The Nomadic Cat[info]lechatnomade on May 2nd, 2008 02:43 am (UTC)
Wow, you make it make sense, and I'm not running off to live on a remote mountain. Thanks!
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
turdoken[info]turdoken on May 2nd, 2008 01:57 pm (UTC)
That was EXCELLENT. I was raised by a CPA so I tend to clearly see one side of the economic equation only and react to it without seeing the other side I need to make a more informed decision! I guess I'm one of the chicken littles, all squack and not enough cluck. If I can read your site regularly maybe I can train myself to be more informed and more balanced! Thanks again!
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)